정기용선계약상 감항의무와 항해과실면책에 관련된 판례분석
An Analysis of the Case related to the Duty of Seaworthy and Exemption of Navigational Risks under Time Charter
In this case, the cause of the explosion had yet to be determined by the arbitrators. The container exploded because it was stowed adjacent to a bunker tank which was heated during the voyage. The present appeal was concerned with two issues, namely: (1) If the stowage was done in such a way as to render the vessel unseaworthy, who is responsible for the losses? (2) Assuming the bunkers were heated to a temperature above what was required to keep the fuel oil reasonably thin, did the owners have a defence to a claim for breach of their duty to care for the goods under Hague-Visby Rules? In relation to the first issue, the charterers were responsible for the losses. And in relation to the second issue, the owners were entitled to rely on the article Ⅳ. rule 2(a) defence.The charterers appealed, contending that the arbitrators erred in law in relation to both issues.
유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.
원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.