계속적 수입채권의 집행에 대하여
Vollstreckung gegen fortsetzlich geleistete Forderungen
The Korean Civil Code provides a limitations period after which period an obligees rights extinguish upon the obligors contest, if the obligee does not exercise the rights during such a period of time. It also provides for a limitations period, 10 or 20 years, after which period an occupier of a piece of realty takes title by adverse possession, subject to other additional requirements. The Code also provides that a “request” by an obligee may be deemed a basis for the tolling of such limitations periods.This paper focuses on the issue of under what situations where a partys conduct during litigation could constitute the request.With respect to “request,” based on the notion that it is necessary to recognize the tolling effect in the case of an obligees exercise of her rights in litigation, the paper construes the term “request” broadly, including not only the plaintiffs commencement of a court case, but also the defendants trial conduct such as raising a defense and using her own rights to defend the case, affirmatively responding to the plaintiffs allegations. It is to be noted that the Supreme Court has taken the same position since a decision in 1993.Such tolling should be deemed to take place, in the case of “request,” at the submission of a complaint, at the submission of an application for amendment, or at the submission of a brief containing the allegation of such rights.
- 원문이 없습니다.
- 원문이 없습니다.
유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.
원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.