본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

가족법연구 , 2010년, pp.179 - 208  
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

미국의 가사중재
On the Family Law Arbitration in U.S.

이경희 
  • 초록

    Arbitration by agreement was once a reasonably discrete practice, mostly confined to business transactions, maritime law issues, construction contracts, agreements among professionals, labor disputes, international commercial matters, and the like. The idea of using arbitration in fields like family law was in force only recently.The prevalence of family law arbitration has changed dramatically in the past decade in U.S. Factors that may have influenced the rise of arbitration by agreement include the popularity of ADR and civil litigation's increasing cost, complexity and delay etc. In some jurisdictions disputants have tried to use the Uniform Arbitration Act to resolve marital disputes. Some courts have declared that some issues, e.g., child support or child custody, may not be arbitrated as matters of public policy, but others have different views. Arbitral awards are final under the Act and similar legislation; these issues must always remain open to protect the best interests of the child, according to courts refusing to allow arbitration on child support, child custody or other related issues.Even though there are some differences between legal structures of Korean family law and that of U.S., two countries are simultaneously confronted such the same problems to harmonize of arbitral awards and the best interests of children. Therefore the developments and theories of family law arbitration in U.S. are worth reviewing for Korean practitioners.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
유료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.