본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

강원법학 , 2017년, pp.627 - 653   http://dx.doi.org/10.18215/kwlr.2017.50..627
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

채권양도와 사해행위가 문제되는 주요 쟁점에 대한 고찰- 판례를 중심으로 -
A Study of Major Issues Concerning the Assignment of Claim and Fraudulent Act

김대희 
  • 초록

    A claim may be assigned(Article 449, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Act). However, if the obligor assigns the claim with the knowledge that it would prejudice the obligee, the obligee may apply to the court for its revocation and restitution of its original status (Article 406 of the Civil Act). Here, restitution of the original status in the clause means restitution of the original property in principle; however, monetary compensation may be admissible in case the original cannot be restored. There are only two articles of the Civil Code concerning the actio pauliana, but the case is very much in practice. Most case resolution takes place on the basis of the existing case law. In this regard, I think that analyzing and summarizing the precedents of revocation of the acts related to the specific issues are very important for resolving similar cases in the future. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that a revocation obligee would not be able to claim a third obligor if the assignment of claim was canceled by an act of destruction. This paper examines the major issues concerning the assignment of claim and fraudulent act on the basis of the above judgment. First, we examine the cases in which the assignment of claim is a fraudulent act, and then examine the existing academic disputes and the right and wrong of the ruling. When the assignment of claim is canceled, the details of the recovery method will be examined in detail.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.