본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

가톨릭철학 , 2018년, pp.59 - 97   http://dx.doi.org/10.16895/cathp.2018.31.1.059
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

셸링의 야코비 비판과 학문적 유신론의 가능성
Schelling's Critique on Jacobi and the Possibility of Scientific Theism

남기호 
  • 초록

    Jacobi in his work, Von den goettlichen Dingen und ihrer Offenbarung (1811) criticized Schelling's Philosophy overall. This article considers Schelling's refutation of it mainly made in his Denkmal der Schrift von den gottlichen Dingen etc. (1812). First of all, Jacobi, in Schelling's view, knows no other than science with demonstrative method. However, such a scientific theism which ranges over the development process from the necessary ground before God's living existence to this existence, is possible. Then, Jacobi misunderstands Schelling's Nature as the mechanic which can never reveal divine nature. To this responds Schelling with emphasis on the meaning of his own concept of nature as the absolute identity in general, so far as it is considered not as existent, but not yet existent, therefore its own ground of being. In other words, it is the nature as ground of being which God as the existent absolute identity has in Himself. Thereby, Schelling deems his philosophy of nature can be concurrently theistic. Lastly, Schelling criticizes that Jacobi's reason assuming the unconditioned only by feeling without sake boils down to the exclusive theism, against which he sets his own true theism reconcilable with the real atheism. But this critique of Schelling may be as ever a bone of contention for Jacobi who pays attention to God as the cause of free personal action.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
유료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.