본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

학위논문 상세정보

低强度紛爭과 對應方案에 관한 硏究 원문보기

  • 저자

    박홍준

  • 학위수여기관

    水原大學校 行政大學院

  • 학위구분

    국내석사

  • 학과

    政策學 專攻

  • 지도교수

  • 발행년도

    2002

  • 총페이지

    iii, 56 p.

  • 키워드

  • 언어

    kor

  • 원문 URL

    http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8954768&outLink=K  

  • 초록

    The suicide terror at World Trade Center that attacked the heart of the United Stated remaining as the most powerful nation in the world after the cold war particularly attracted our attention because of the unprecedented specificity that hijacked civil airplanes were used as terrorist weapons. This outrage was serious enough to divert our heed to a new type of war in the twenty-first century, also referred to as a fourth generation warfare, a stateless warfare or an asymmetric warfare. Even after the end of the cold war, international disputes have not been on the decrease but still continue as before. These disputes came to be burst out of the exposure of the dispute factors dormant in the controllability of the United States and the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics got deteriorated along with the collapse of the cold war. International disputes at the time of the cold war assumed and aspect of international war characteristic of a proxy war between U.S.A. and USSR during the cold war bur began to represent such aspects as a small-scale local war, a civil war, terror, etc. posterior to the end of the cold war. To provide for such disputes, every nation in the world is enacting corresponding laws and building military forces in order to cope with new types of disputes. Korea also is in need of the establishment of and endeavors for the new concept of dispute. However, in Korea such a new concept has not yet been established and efforts for the development of proper strategies as well as for building military forces still remain insufficient. It seems that the cause of a dispute of low intensity consists in the explosion of complex dispute causes hidden in the instability of international situation during the cold war period. Such a dispute tends to be deteonated by contact in an instant out of varied factors. Furthermore, the possibility cannot be excluded that U.S.A. and Russia will intervent. It is likely to be with ease for us to settle disputes partly because of the selective intervention policy in consideration of economic burdens in getting control over disputes of low intensity in America. Furthermore, the integration of opinions is not satisfactorily achieved even through U.N or other local organiztions, and a lack of ability to do so led to poor control over disputes. Disputes of low intensity may be said to be a field in which we need to take a keen interest. In order to formulate proper strategies against low-intensity disputes, this study wcanned strategies, the enactment of pertinent laws, organizations and units against disputes. It was found as a result of having conducted a case study of them, that America and japan have the basic concept of offensive coping and active intervention for settlement. Matters to be attended to the establishment of strategies may include threat, military idelogies, social factors, etc. The goals against low-intensity disputes in Korea may include 1) prevention of low-intensity disputes and ofensive coping at the time of failure of suppression, 2) the reinforcement of international cooperation, and 3) local stabilization and contribution to world peace through gaining control over disputes. The basic concept of strategies against low-intensity diwputes consists in preparing and flexibility. That is to say, it is needed to integrally prepare strategies by mobilizing all means on a national level and then rapidly cope with dispu tes. As for confrontation against low-intensity disputes, this study scrutinized corresponding laws, regulations, and the performance of operations. In order to efficiently cope with low-intensity disputes, we need to cultivate specialists, along with integrally coping with them by trying every means available. Moreover, for the efficient control over international crises, it is necessitated to construct a cooperation system with neighboring countries to settle disputes.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역