본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

학위논문 상세정보

요약 결과지식의 빈도가 운동기술의 수행과 학습에 미치는 영향 원문보기
(The) Effects of summary knowledge of results on the performance and learning of motor skills

  • 저자

    김진기

  • 학위수여기관

    慶尙大學校 大學院

  • 학위구분

    국내박사

  • 학과

    체육학과

  • 지도교수

  • 발행년도

    2004

  • 총페이지

    xii, 137p.

  • 키워드

    결과지식 운동기술 체육학;

  • 언어

    kor

  • 원문 URL

    http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10060036&outLink=K  

  • 초록

    The purpose of this study was to determine optimal frequency of summary KR according to difficulty of tasks and skill levels of learners. Subjects were 60 high school students and were required to perform golf putting tasks. The following consequences were given as the result of analyses of absolute error(AE), constant error(CE), and variable error(VE) of groups during the acquisition and retention phases. As the skill level of learners was high in the simple task, 10 trials summary KR group was effective to reduce AE, and 5 trials summary KR group was effective to reduce VE. As the skill level of learners was low in the simple task, 5 trials summary KR group was effective to reduce AE. As the skill level of learners was high in the complex task, 5 trials summary KR group was effective to reduce both AE and VE. As the skill level of learners was low in the complex task, 1 trial and 5 trials summary KR group were effective to reduce AE. The results revealed that optimal frequency of summary KR was changed by skill levels of learners. That is, in simple task, the higher the skill level of learners was, the more effective low frequency of summary KR was, and the lower the skill level of learners was, the more effective high frequency of summary KR was. On the other hand, in the complex task, high frequency of summary KR was effective in both the high skill level and low skill level. Especially, the lower the skill level of learners was, the more effective high frequency of summary KR was. In conclusion, further research will have to study optimal frequency of summary KR according to skill levels of learners, experience of tasks, age, and sex distinction.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역