본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

쌍대비교에 기반한 승법적 효용함수의 결정
Determination of Multiplicative Utility Function Based on the Pair-wise Comparisons

김경모   (금오공과대학교 신소재시스템공학부(산업시스템공학)UU0000297  );
  • 초록

    The ever increasing demand for enhanced competitiveness of engineered products requires "designing-in-quality" strategies that can effectively and efficiently incorporate concepts of uncertainty and quality into design. Multi-attribute utility function is commonly used to represent the decision-maker's preference on multiple design attributes under conditions of uncertainty and risk. One of the major issues in implementing this approach concerns the generation of appropriate utility function, especially in a complex engineering design environment. Typically, the decision maker's preference is revealed through lottery questions rather than being structured on the deductive reasoning to reflect the nonlinear tradeoffs among the attributes. The use of such intuitive procedures can lead to inexact preference information that may result in inaccuracy and rank reversal problems. This paper presents an alternative procedure based on the pair-wise comparisons between design alternatives towards a consistent preference presentation in assessing multiplicative utility function. The effectiveness of the overall procedures is tested with the aid of an injection-molding process design for a capacitor can and the results are discussed.


  • 주제어

    Multiresponse .   Multiplicative Utility .   Pair-wise Comparisons.  

  • 참고문헌 (34)

    1. 김성희 외(1999), 의사결정분석 및 응용, 개정판, 영지문화사 
    2. 김호성 외(2001), 강건설계를 이용한 품질공학 , 민영사 
    3. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947), The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 
    4. Bisgaard, S. and Amkenman, B.(1995), 'Analytic Parameter Design', Quality Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. 75-91 
    5. Box, G. E. P. and Liu, P. Y. T.(1999), 'Statistics as a Catalyst to Learning by Scientific Method. Part II-A Discussion', Journal of Quaity Technology, Vol. 31, pp. 16-20 
    6. Fischer, G. W.(1979), 'Utility Models for Multiple Objective Decisions : Do They Accurately Represent Human Preferences?', Decision Sciences, Vol. 10, pp. 451-479 
    7. Khuri, A. I. and Conlon, M.(1981), 'Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions', Technometrics, Vol. 23, pp. 363-375 
    8. Lind, E. E., Goldin, J. and Hickman, J. B. (1960), 'Fitting Yield and Cost Response Surfaces', Chem. Eng. Prog., Vol. 56, pp. 62-68 
    9. Pignatiello, J. J., Jr.(1993), 'Strategies for Robust Multi-Response Quality Engineering', IIE Transactions, Vol. 25, pp. 5-15 
    10. Vining, G. G. and Myers, R. H.(1990), 'Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies ?' A Dual Response Approach', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 22, pp. 38-45 
    11. 박종천, 김경모(2003), '쌍대비교에 기초한 다속성 효용함수의 결정 및 사출성형문제에 대한 응용', 한국소성가공학회 12권, pp. 465-472 
    12. Moldflow manual(1996), Moldflow Pty. Ltd 
    13. Ames, A. E., Mattucci, N., MacDonald, S., Szonyi, G., and Hawkins, D. M.(1997), 'Quality Loss Functions for Optimization cross Multiple Response Surfaces', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 29, pp. 339-346 
    14. Sykes, E. A. and White, C. C. III. (1991), 'Multiattribute intelligent computer-aided design', IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1498-1511 
    15. Yang, J. B. and Sen P.(1996), 'Preference Modeling by Estimating Local Utility Functions for Multiobjective Optimization', European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 115-138 
    16. Harrington, E. C., Jr.(1965), 'The Desirability Function', Industrial Quality Control, Vol. 21, pp. 494-498 
    17. Thurston, D. L.(1991), 'A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes', Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3, pp. 105-122 
    18. Larichev, Q. I. and Moshkovich, H. M. (1995), 'ZAPROS- method and system for rank-ordering of multiattribute alternative', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 82, pp. 503-521 
    19. Myers, R. H., Khuri, A. I., and Vining, G. G.(1992), 'Response Surface Alternative to the Taguchi Robust Parameter Design Approach', The American Statistician, Vol. 46, pp. 131-139 
    20. Miro-Quesada, G. and Del Castillo, E. (2004), 'Two Approaches for Improving the Dual Response Method in Robust Parameter Design', Jounal of Quality Technology Vol. 36, pp. 154-168 
    21. Del Castillo, E., Montgomery, D. C. and McCarville, D. R.(1996), 'Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization', Journal of Quality Technology Vol. 28, pp. 337-345 
    22. Badinelli, R and Baker, J. R.(1990), 'Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Inexact Value-Function Assessment', Decision Science, Vol. 21, pp. 318-336 
    23. Hazerlrigg, G. A.(1996), 'Systems Engineering : A New Framework for Engineering Design', American Siciety of Mechanical Engineers, Dynamic System and Control Division (Publication) DSC, Vol. 60, pp. 39-46 
    24. Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H.(1993), Decisions with Multiple Objectives : Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons Inc., NY, pp. 282-343 
    25. Yao, D.(1998), 'Direct Search-Based Automatic Minimization of Warpage And Weldlines in Injection Molded Parts', Master's Thesis, U. of Massachusetts, MA, pp. 40-88 
    26. Olson, D. L. and Moshkovich, H. M.(1995), 'Consistency and Accuracy in Decision Aids : Experiments with Four Multiat-tribute Systems', Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 723-748 
    27. Li, W. and Wu, C. F. J.(1999), 'An Integrated Method of Parameter Design and Tolerance Design', Quality Engineering, Vol. 11, pp. 417-425 
    28. Ortiz, F., Jr., Simpson, J. R. and Pignatiello, J. J., Jr.(2004), 'A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiple-Response Optimization', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 36, pp. 432-450 
    29. Del Castillo, E. and Montgomery, D. C. (1993), 'A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 25, pp. 199-204 
    30. Gold, S. and Krishnamurty, S.(1997), 'Trade-offs in Robust Engineering Design', Proceedings of ASME-DETC'97, Sacramento, CA, pp. 1-8 
    31. Romano, D., Varetto, M. and Vicario, G. (2004), 'Multiresponse Robust Design: A General Framework Based on Combined Array', Jounal of Quality Technology, Vol. 36, pp. 27-37 
    32. Vining, G. G.(1998), 'A Compromise Approach To Multiple Optimization', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 30, pp. 309-313 
    33. Fichitali, J., Van De Voort, F. R. and Khuri, A. I.(1990), 'Multiresponse Optimization of Acid Casein Production', Journal of Food Process Engineering, Vol. 12, pp. 247-258 
    34. Derringer, G. and Suich, R.(1980), 'Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 12, pp. 214-219 

 저자의 다른 논문

  • 김경모 (16)

    1. 1994 "하위특성의 안정된 허용차 결정방법" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 22 (1): 133~141    
    2. 2000 "다특성 강건설계법을 이용한 집적회로설계" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 28 (1): 78~94    
    3. 2001 "TOPSIS와 콤플렉스법에 의한 사출성형품의 다속성 강건설계" 한국정밀공학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering 18 (12): 116~123    
    4. 2001 "설계자 선호도를 고려한 다특성 강건설계법" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 29 (1): 47~61    
    5. 2001 "직접탐색법을 이용한 사출성형품의 강건설계" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 29 (3): 86~96    
    6. 2001 "반응표면분석법을 이용한 사출성형품의 휨의 강건설계" 소성가공 = Transactions of materials processing : Journal of the Korean society for technology of plastics 10 (6): 493~499    
    7. 2003 "쌍대비교에 기초한 다속성 효용함수의 결정 및 사출성형설계에 대한 응용" 소성가공 = Transactions of materials processing : Journal of the Korean society for technology of plastics 12 (5): 465~472    
    8. 2003 "설계자 선호도를 고려한 동적 시스템의 강건설계법" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 31 (4): 239~246    
    9. 2004 "강건성을 고려한 모니터 장식패널 사출품의 휨 최소화" 한국CAD/CAM학회논문집 = Transactions of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers 9 (4): 351~360    
    10. 2007 "기술적 설계제약을 고려한 강건설계법" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 35 (4): 52~60    

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기