본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Effect of Family Size and Genetic Correlation between Purebred and Crossbred Halfsisters on Response in Crossbred and Purebred Chickens under Modified Reciprocal Recurrent Selection

Singh, Neelam    (C/O S. P. Singh, DSP/ARO, DCR, Reserve Police Lines   ); Singh, Raj Pal    (Department of Animal Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University   ); Sangwan, Sandeep    (Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, U.P. College   ); Malik, Baljeet Singh    (Department of Animal Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University  );
  • 초록

    Response in a modified reciprocal recurrent selection scheme for egg production was evaluated considering variable family sizes and genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred half sisters. The criteria of selection of purebred breeders included pullet's own performance, purebred full and half sisters and crossbred half sister's performance. Heritability of egg production of crossbreds (aggregate genotype) and purebred's was assumed to be 0.2 and genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred half sisters ( $r_{pc}$ ) as 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 1.0, -0.1, -0.2, -0.3, -0.4, -0.5 and -1.0. Number of dams per sire to produce purebred and crossbred progenies assumed to be 5, 6, 7, 8, while number of purebred female progeny ( $N_p$ ) and crossbred progeny ( $N_c$ ) per dam were considered to be 3, 4, 5 and 6 in each case. Considering phenotypic variance as unity, selection indices were constructed for different combinations of dams and progeny for each value of $r_{pc}$ . Following selection index theory, response in crossbred and purebred for egg production was computed. Results indicated that response in crossbreds depended mainly on crossbred family size and also on magnitude of $r_{pc}$ irrespective of its direction, and response was greater with large crossbred family size than the purebred families. Correlated response in purebreds depends both on magnitude and direction of $r_{pc}$ and was expected to be greater with large purebred family size only. Inclusion of purebred information increased the accuracy of selection for crossbred response for higher magnitude of $r_{pc}$ irrespective of its direction. Present results indicate that desirable response in both crossbred and purebred performance is a function of $r_{pc}$ and family sizes. The ratio of crossbred and purebred family sizes can be optimized depending on the objective of improving the performance of crossbreds and/or of purebreds.


  • 주제어

    Response .   Genetic Gain .   M-RRS .   Genetic Correlation.  

  • 참고문헌 (23)

    1. Arthur, J. A. 1986. An evaluation of industry breeding programs for egg type chickens. Proc. of 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 10:325-335. 
    2. Hill, W. G. 1971. Theoretical aspects of crossbreeding. Annals de genetique et de selection Animale 3:23-24. 
    3. Krehbiel, E. V., H. O. Hetzer, A. E. Flower, G. E. Dickerson, W. R. Harvey and L. A. Swiger. 1971. Effectiveness of reciprocal recurrent selection for performance of crosses between Montana No. 1 and Yorkshire swine. I. Preweaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 32:191-210. 
    4. Robertson, A. 1971. Optimum utilization of genetic material with special reference to cross-breeding in relation to other methods of genetic improvement (Introduction report). Proc. of the Xth International Congress on Animal Production, Paris-vesailles, pp. 57-68. 
    5. Sellier, P. 1982. Selecting populations for use in crossbreeding. Proc. of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production, 6:15-49. 
    6. Wie, M. and J. H. J. van der Werf. 1994. Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information. Anim. Prod. 59:401-413. 
    7. Comstock, R. E. and H. F. Robinson. 1957. Finding relative to reciprocal recurrent selection. Proc. of International Genetics Symposium, Science Council of Japan, Tokyo pp. 461-464. 
    8. Pirchner, F. 1976. Genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance in poultry. Bulletin Technique, Department de Genetique Animale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique No. 24: 63-67 (Anim. Breed Abstr. 45:420). 
    9. Wong, W. C., W. J. Boylan and W. E. Rempel. 1971. Purebred versus crossbred performance as a basis of selection in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 32:605-610. 
    10. Wie, M. and H. A. M. van der Steen. 1991. Comparison of pureline selection with reciprocal recurrent selection system in animal breeding (a review). Anim. Breed Abstr. 59:281-298. 
    11. Hetzer, H. D., R. H. Miller and R. C. Kling. 1977. Effectiveness of RRS for improving preweaning performance in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 45:989-1009. 
    12. Cress, C. E. 1966. A comparison of recurrent selection systems. Genetics 54:1371-1379. 
    13. Brown, W. P. and A. E. Bell. 1980. An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response. Genetics 94:477-496. 
    14. Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469-485. 
    15. Pirchner, F. and R. Mergl. 1977. Overdominance as cause for heterosis in poultry. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 94:151-158. 
    16. Pirchner, F. and C. M. Von Krosigk. 1973. Genetic parameters of cros- and purebred poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 14:193-202. 
    17. Vinson, W. E., E. J. Eison. and O. W. Robinson. 1969. Predicted response to selection for crossbred performance in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 28:725-733. 
    18. Bell, A. E. 1982. Selection for heterosis-results with laboratory and domestic animals. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 6:206-227. 
    19. Singh, R. P. and J. Kumar. 1994. Biometrical Methods in Poultry Breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India. 
    20. Biswas, D. K. and J. V. Craig. 1969. Relationship between purebred and crossbred paternal half-sisters' performance in chickens. Poult. Sci. 48:524-526. 
    21. Bell, A. E. and C. H. Moore. 1972. Reciprocal recurrent selection for pupal weight in Tribolium in comparison with conventional methods. Egyptian J. Genet. Cytol. 1:92-119. 
    22. Singh, R. P. and L. Dempfle. 1989. Optimising multistage selection in a modified reciprocal recurrent selection programme considering cost and rate of genetic progress. Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin, Vol. 1 (summaries), p. 167. 
    23. Comstock, R. E. 1961. Reciprocal recurrent selection with reference to swine breeding. Twenty second annual report, Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa. 

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
유료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기