본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Comparing the Use of Self and Peer Assessment: A Case Study in a Statistics Course

Han, Kyung-Soo    (Department of Statistical Informatics, Chonbuk National University   ); Mun, Gil-Seong    (Department of Statistical Informatics, Chonbuk National University   ); Ahn, Jeong-Yong    (Department of Statistical Informatics, Chonbuk National University  );
  • 초록

    In this study, we compare the assessments made by self, peer and instructor in a statistics course. The goal is to investigate the following two questions: (1) Is it reasonable or fair to expect students to be responsible for assessing the work of their colleagues and themselves? (2) What are students' opinions about the learning effect after they participate in the assessment process? As part of the study investigating these questions, we designed a prototype for a Web-based assessment tool and a procedure to apply the assessment techniques in a statistics course. In addition, we collected and analyzed the data produced in the assessment processes from students and the instructor. The analysis results are summarized as follows: First, self assessment was not accord with instructor assessment, but peer assessment was similar to the assessment by instructor. This result reflected that it is reasonable or fair to expect students to be responsible for assessing the work of their colleagues. Second, peer assessment of their colleagues successfully helped students increase their understanding of the course, and the students increased their skills in the actual assessment process by assessing the work of their colleagues. Finally, many students indicated a high interest level on the assessments.


  • 주제어

    Self and peer assessment .   learning effectiveness .   assessment data analysis.  

  • 참고문헌 (27)

    1. A'ali, M. (2007). Adoption of peer-to-peer assessment in a computing skills course, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 4, 828?833 
    2. Ahn, J. Y., Han, K. S. and Han, B. S. (2005). Web-based education: Characteristics, problems, and some solutions, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 2, 274?282 
    3. Ahn, J. Y., Mun, G. S. and Han, K. S. (2009). Comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment in a statistics course, Proceedings of the IMS-APRM & 2009 Conference of the Korean Statistical Society, 183 
    4. Barbosa, H. and Garcia, F. (2005). Importance of online assessment in the e-learning process, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, F3B/1-F3B/6 
    5. Barchino, R., Gutierrez, J. M., Oton, S., Martinez, J. J., Hilera, J. R. and Gutierrez de Mesa, J. A. (2006). E-learning model for assessment, Proceedings of the Virtual Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 
    6. Bouchillon, W. H., Meyer, T. and White, J. (1999). 21st century assessment (One in a series of products for Preparing All Learners PAL for the Workforce), The University of West Florida 
    7. Cahyadi, V. (2004). The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, Indonesia. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 455?464 
    8. Cooper, T. and Love, T. (2002). Online portfolios: Issues of assessment and pedagogy, In Jeffrey, P.(Ed.), AARE 2001: Crossing Borders: New Frontiers of Educational Research 
    9. Doignon, J. P. and Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge Spaces, Springer, Germany 
    10. Dureva, D. and Tuparov, G. (2006). Assessment models in e-learning environments, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, IV.7-1 - IV.7-5 
    11. Ellington, H., Earl, S. and Cowan, J. (1997). Making effective use of peer and self assessment, Technical Paper, The Robert Gordon University, England 
    12. Gentile, E. and Plantamura, P. (2003). Assessment and self-assessment in e-learning courseware, Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 1587?1590 
    13. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, 66, 64?74 
    14. Jain, L. C., Tedman, R. A. and Tedman, D. K. (2007). Evolution of Teaching and Learning Paradigms in Intelligent Environment, Springer, Germany 
    15. Joordens, S., Desa, S. and Pare, D. (2009). The pedagogical anatomy of peer-assessment: Dissecting a peer Scholar assignment, The Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 7, 1?6 
    16. Lai, K. R. and Lan, C. H. (2006). Modelling peer assessment as agent negotiation in a computer supported collaborative learning environment, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9, 16?26 
    17. Love, T. and Cooper, T. (2004). Designing online information systems for portfolio-based assessment:Design criteria and heuristics, Journal of Information Technology Education, 3, 65?81 
    18. Miao, Y. and Koper, R. (2007). An effcient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 502?511 
    19. Miao, Y., Tattersall, C., Schoonenboom, J., Stevanov, K. and Petrova, A. A. (2007). Using open technical e-learning standards and service-orientation to support new forms of e-assessment, Proceedings of the TENCompetence 
    20. Orpen, C. (1982). Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: A research note, Higher Education, 11, 567?572 
    21. Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R. and Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio?, Educational Leadership, 48, 60?63 
    22. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture, Educational Researcher, 29, 4?14 
    23. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merrienboer, J. and Martens, R. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions, Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 41, 60?79 
    24. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249?276 
    25. Watering, G., Gijbels, D., Dochy, F. and Rijt, J. (2008). Students' assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results, Higher Education, 56, 645?658 
    26. Wen, M. L. and Tsai, C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and sttitudes toward (online) peer assessment, Higher Education, 51, 27?44 
    27. Wheater, P., Langan, A. M. and Dunleavy, P. (2005). Students assessing student: Case studies on peer assessment, Planet, 15, 13?15 

 저자의 다른 논문

  • 한경수 (24)

    1. 1990 "분산이 미지인 정규모집단의 평균에 대한 베이즈-P* 선택방법에 관한 연구+" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics 3 (2): 79~89    
    2. 1993 "S-PLUS의 소개 및 SAS 와의 그래픽 비교" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics 6 (1): 1~11    
    3. 1996 "MS-EXCEL과 Visual Basic으로 개발한 통계적 공정관리 소프트웨어" 品質經營學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 24 (2): 172~178    
    4. 1999 "On the Development of Statistical Software using Microsoft COM Technology on the Internet Environment" 한국통계학회 논문집 = Communications of the Korean Statistical Society 6 (2): 533~542    
    5. 1999 "정보사회에서의 통계학과 : 위기인가\ulcorner 기회인가\ulcorner" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics 12 (1): 295~304    
    6. 1999 "정보 관련 통계학과의 교과과정" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics 12 (2): 683~703    
    7. 2000 "On-Line Analytical Processing and Research Problems for Statisticians" 한국통계학회 논문집 = Communications of the Korean Statistical Society 7 (2): 457~463    
    8. 2000 "웹을 이요한 데이터 수집 및 관리에 관한 연구 : 강의평가 시스템 구현" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics 13 (2): 287~296    
    9. 2001 "A Proposal of Some Analysis Methods for Discovery of User Information from Web Data" 한국통계학회 논문집 = Communications of the Korean Statistical Society 8 (1): 281~289    
    10. 2001 "웹 로그(WEB LOG) 데이터 분석 방법에 관한 연구" 응용통계연구 = The Korean journal of applied statistics 14 (2): 261~271    
  • 문길성 (3)

  • 안정용 (18)

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • NDSL :
  • 한국통계학회 : 저널
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기