본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

大韓齒科保存學會誌 = Journal of Korean Academy of Operative Dentistry v.35 no.2, 2010년, pp.69 - 79  
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

레진 시멘트의 film thickness가 간접 복합 레진 수복물의 접착 효율에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
EFFECT OF FILM THICKNESS OF RESIN CEMENT ON BONDING EFFICIENCY IN INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESTORATION

이상혁   (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실  ); 최기운   (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실  ); 최경규   (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실  );
  • 초록

    본 연구는 여러 레진 시멘트의 film thickness에 따른 상아질과 간접 레진 수복물 간의 미세인장 결합 강도를 측정하고, 각 레진 시멘트의 중합 수축 및 굴곡 강도, 탄성 계수를 비교 분석하며, 접착 계면 및 파단면의 주사전자 현미경 관찰을 통하여 레진 시멘트의 film thickness가 레진 간접 수복물의 접착 효율에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 시행하였다. 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트인 Variolink II와 Duo-Link, 접착형 레진 시멘트인 Panavia F와 Rely X Unicem의 4가지 레진 시멘트를 사용하였고, 각각의 시멘트를 film thickness에 따라 $50\;{\mu}m$ (control)의 대조군과 $50\;{\mu}m$ (T50), $100\;{\mu}m$ (T100), $150\;{\mu}m$ (T150)의 실험군으로 나누어 총 16개의 군으로 분류하였다. 데이터는 ANOVA와 Duncan's multiple comparison test (p 0.05). 2. Film thickness가 증가할수록 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트의 결합 강도는 유의성 있게 감소(p 0.05). 3. Panavia F는 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 낮은 중합 수축량을 나타냈다(p


    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of film thickness of various resin cements on bonding efficiency in indirect composite restoration by measurement of microtensile bond strength, polymerization shrinkage, flexural strength and modulus, fractographic FE-SEM analysis. Experimental groups were divided according to film thickness ( $50\;{\mu}m$ -control, $50\;{\mu}m$ -T50, $100\;{\mu}m$ -T100, $150\;{\mu}m$ -T150) using composite- based resin cements (Variolink II, Duo-Link) and adhesive-based resin cements (Panavia F, Rely X Unicem). The data was analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison test (p 0.05). 2. Microtensile bond strength of composite-based resin cements were decreased significantly according to increasing film thickness (p 0.05). 3. Panavia F showed significantly lower polymerization shrinkage than other resin cements (p


  • 주제어

    레진 시멘트 .   간접 복합 레진 수복물 .   접착 효율.  

  • 참고문헌 (47)

    1. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 13:60D-76D, 2000. 
    2. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80:280-301, 1998. 
    3. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 81:135-141, 1999. 
    4. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites. Part I. Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 20:133-146, 1993. 
    5. Sjogren G, Molin M, Van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays(Cerec) cemented with either a dualcured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 53:325-330, 1995. 
    6. Casson AM, Glyn Jones JC, Youngson CC, Wood DJ. The effect of luting media on fracture resistance of a flame sprayed all-ceramic crown. J Dent 29:539-544, 2001. 
    7. Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 26:293-300, 1995. 
    8. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 21:823-831, 1990. 
    9. Cook WD, Thomasz F. A photocured composite resin with an apparent infinite depth of cure. Aust Dent J 28:243, 1983. 
    10. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215-235, 2003. 
    11. Sensat ML, Brackett WW, Meinberg TA, Beatty MW. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 88:50-53, 2002. 
    12. Ogawa T, Tanaka M, Matsuya S, Aizawa S, Koyano K. Setting characteristics of five autopolymerizing resins measured by an oscillating rheometer. J Prosthet Dent 85:170-176, 2001. 
    13. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesive and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 17:542-556, 2001. 
    14. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thickness of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 101:189-192, 2009. 
    15. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 8:327-335, 2006. 
    16. Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R, Meister C, Petschelt A. Curing contraction in thin bonding composite resin layers. In: Mormann WH, editor. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restoration. The state of art of the Cerec method. Berlin: Quintessence 577-590, 1991. 
    17. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 7:107-113, 1991. 
    18. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63:146-148, 1984. 
    19. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 55:446-447, 1986. 
    20. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-1639, 1987. 
    21. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wallto-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 68L 48-50, 1989. 
    22. Gemalmaz D, Kkrer D. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays. J Oral Rehabil 33:436-442, 2006. 
    23. D’Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D’Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 98:193-198, 2007. 
    24. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117-125, 1995. 
    25. Li ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 81:597-609, 1999. 
    26. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699-705, 1999. 
    27. ISO 4049 : International Standard Dentistry Resinbased dental filling materials. 1998. 
    28. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence c, 1998. 
    29. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NRFA, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 32:55-65, 2004. 
    30. Audenino G, Bresciano ME, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 12:342-347, 1999. 
    31. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 12:245-249, 1996. 
    32. Wassell RW, Gagliano G. Effects of adhesive fixed prosthesis retainer design on resultant resin luting agent thickness. J Prosthet Dent 80:479-484, 1998. 
    33. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79:812-817, 2000. 
    34. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 75:1034-1044, 1996. 
    35. 조민우, 박상혁, 김종률, 최경규. 레진 시멘트의 접착 내구성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 32:343-355, 2007.     
    36. Mak YF, Lai SCN, Cheung GSP, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 18:609-621, 2002. 
    37. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CKY, Sanares AM, Wei SW. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5:27-40, 2003. 
    38. Ikemura K, Endo T. Effect on adhesion of new polymerization initiator systems comprising 5- monosubstituted barbituric acids, aromatic sulphonate amides, and tert-butyl peroxymaleic acid in dental adhesive resin. J App Poly Sci 72:1655-1668, 1999. 
    39. Nyunt NM, Imai Y. Adhesion to dentin with resin using sulfinic acid initiator system. Dent Mater 15:175-182, 1996. 
    40. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371-382, 2002. 
    41. 최승모, 박상혁, 최경규, 박상진. 중간층 레진 적용이 단일 접착과정 상아질 접착제의 접착에 미치는 영향. 대한치과보존학회지 32:313-326, 2007.     
    42. 김도완, 박상진, 최경규. 자가 부식형 상아질 접착제와 레진 시멘트와의 적합성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 30:493-504, 2005.     
    43. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Degree of conversion of dual-cure luting resins light-polymerized through various materials. Acta Odontol Scand 65:201-205, 2007. 
    44. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 17:357-363, 2004. 
    45. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an autoadhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963-971, 2004. 
    46. Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro- tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 22:45-56, 2006. 
    47. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 21:1150-1157, 2005. 

 저자의 다른 논문

  • 이상혁 (1)

    1. 2004 "치수강 상아질에 대한 상아질 접착제의 결합 강도에 관한 연구" 大韓齒科保存學會誌 = Journal of Korean Academy of Operative Dentistry 29 (1): 13~22    
  • 최기운 (64)

  • 최경규 (44)

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠
이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기