본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Journal of crop science and biotechnology v.13 no.1, 2010년, pp.53 - 60   피인용횟수: 2

Genetic and Chemical Analyses of six Cowpea and two Phaseolus Bean species Differing in Resistance to Weevil Pest

Abdel-Sabour, A.G.    (Dept. of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University   ); Obiadalla-Ali, H.A.    (Dept. of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University   ); AbdelRehim, K.A.    (Dept. of Botany, Faculty of Science, Sohag University  );
  • 초록

    The objective of this work was to evaluate the genetic variability among six cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivars differing in their resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) weevil. Two resistant bean cultivars were used to compare between the sensitive, moderate tolerant, and high tolerant cowpea cultivars. The differentiations were performed by using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting, protein concentration and organic and non-organic components in seed coat. Six polymorphic primers were identified, resulting in different informative bands. Based on polymorphic profiles, three clusters were formed. Clustering was mainly affected by the resistance to weevil pest. The sensitive cowpea cultivars were separated in one group, the moderate tolerant and high tolerant cultivars came in separate groups, and finally, the resistant bean cultivars separated clearly in one distinct group. The most interesting result was represented by concentration of total protein in the seed coat. The protein concentration in the resistant bean cultivars were approximately 50% less than concentration in each of the moderate tolerant and sensitive cultivars of cowpea. Ferric ions were about 25% less than the moderate tolerant and sensitive cultivars. The concentrations of calcium and potassium in seed coats were higher in the resistant beans than in cowpea cultivars. Cobalt was about four times higher in resistant bean than in the sensitive and moderate tolerant cowpea cultivars, which may play a major role in seed resistance to weevil.


  • 주제어

    Vigna unguiculata .   Callosobruchus maculates (F.   ) .   RAPD fingerprinting .   total protein .   seed coat.  

  • 참고문헌 (53)

    1. Abd El-Ghani AM, El-Sayad ZS, Omar N. 2007. Agronomic characterization vs. DNA marker-based genetic similarity of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.) Egyptian landraces. Egypt J. Plant Breed. 11: 143-160 
    2. Akintola AJ, Oyegoke OO. 2004. Physico-Chemical Properties of Ten Cowpea Lines on Resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (Walp. ). Ethiop J. Sci. 27: 71-74 
    3. Applebaum SW, Tadmore U, Podoler M. 1970. The effect of starch and of a heteropolysaccharide fraction from Phaseolus vulgaris on development and fecundity of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 13: 61-70 
    4. Black CA. 1982. Method of Soil Analysis Part 2, Ed 2, Agronomy INC, Madison, USA 
    5. Dahlberg JA. 2000. Classification and characterization of sorghum. In CW Smith, RA Frederikson, eds, Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology and Production, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp 99-130 
    6. Doebley J. 1989. Isozyme evidence and evolution of crop plants. In DE Sltis, PS Soltis, eds, Isozymes in Plant Biology, Dioscorides Press, Portland, pp 165-191 
    7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tis sue. Focus (Gaithersburg, Md.) 12: 13-24 
    8. Edde PA, Amatobi CI. 2003. Seed coat has no value in protecting cowpea seed against attack by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). J. Stored Products Res. 39: 1-10 
    9. Fang J, Chao CCT, Roberts PA, Ehlers JD. 2007. Genetic diversity of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in four West African and USA breeding programs as determined by AFLP analysis. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 54:1197-1209 
    10. Gayan RSR, Priyani P, Krishanthi A. 2006. Physicochemical changes of stored cowpea, Vigna unguiculata, treated with selected essential oils to control cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). J. Food Agr. Environ. 4 (3&4): 41-44 
    11. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. 'Statistical Produce for Agri. Res.' 2nd Ed. John-Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York pp 680 
    12. Jaccard P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44: 223-270 
    13. Janzen D. 1977. How Southern cowpea weevil larvae (Bruchidae: Callosobruchus maculatus) die on nonhost seeds. Ecology 58: 921-927 
    14. Johns MA, Skroch PW, Nienhuis J, Hinrichsen P, Bascur G, Munoy-Schick C. 1997. Gene pool classification of common bean landraces from Chile based on RAPD and morphological data. Crop Sci. 37: 607-613 
    15. Joyee TA, Abberton MT, Michaelson-Yeates TPT, Forster JW. 1999. Relationships between genetic distance measured by RAPD-PCR and heterosis in inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica 107: 159-165 
    16. Khokhar M, Gupta AS. 1974. Relative resistance of some varieties of wheat to Sitophilus oryza (L.) and Rhizopertha dominica (F.) at different temperatures. Bull. Grains Tech. 12: 117-123 
    17. Lowery OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 291-297 
    18. Macedo MLR, Andrade LBS, Moraes RA, Xavier-Filho J. 1993. Vicilin variants and the resistance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds to the cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 105C: 89-94 
    19. Macedo MLR, Fernandes KVS, Sales MP, Xavier-Filho J. 1995. Purification and some properties of storage proteins (vicilins) from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds which are susceptible and resistant to the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 28: 183-190 
    20. Mantel NA. 1967. The detecton of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220 
    21. Messina FI, Renwick IAA. 1985. Resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in selected cowpea lines. Environ. Entomol. 14: 868-872 
    22. Moise AJ, Han S, Gudynaite-Savitch L, Johanson DA, Miki BLA. 2005. Seed Coats: Structure, Development, Composition, and Biotechnology. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 41: 620-644 
    23. Moraes RA, Sales MP, Silva LB, Oliveira AEA, Machado OLT, Fernandes KVS, Xavier-Filho J. 2000. Phaseolin in Phaseolus lunatus testa is detrimental to Callosobruchus maculatus (cowpea weevil). Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 33: 191-198 
    24. Nakhla IM. 1988. Loss in seed weight of five different pluse grain caused by the cowpea weevil Callosobruchus macullatus (F.). Agric. Res. Rev. 66: 71-75 
    25. Nielsen S, Ohler T, Mitchell C. 1997. Cowpea leaves for human consumption: production, utilization, and nutrient composition. In B Singh, D Mohan Raj, K Dashiell, L Jackai, eds, Advances in cowpea research. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCASS), Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 326-332 
    26. Nkongolo KK. 2003. Genetic characterization of Malawian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) landraces: diversity and gene flow among accessions. Euphytica 129: 219-228 
    27. Nkongolo KK, Nsapato L. 2002. Genetic diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench accessions from different ecogeographical regions in Malawi assessed with RAPDs. Gen. Res. Crop Evol. 50: 149-156 
    28. Obiadalla-Ali HA, Salman AMA, Abd El-hady MAH. 2007. Screening some local and introduced cowpea cultivars for dry-seed yield and resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Ann. Agr. Sci. 52: 197-212 
    29. Ofuya TI. 1987. Callosobruchus macullatus (F.) (Coleoptera Bruchidae) oviposition behaviour on cowpea seeds. Insect Sci. Appl. 8: 77-79 
    30. Pandey S, Kumar S, Rai M, Mishra U, Singh M. 2008. Assessment of genetic diversity in Indian ash gourd (Benincasa hispida) accessions using RAPD markers. Proc. IXth EUCARPIA Meeting Genetics Breeding of Cucurbitaceae, M Pitrat, ed, INRA, Avignon (France), May 21-24th 
    31. Phansak P, Taylor PWJ, Srinives P, Mongkolporn O. 2001. Level of polymorphisms in five accessions of yardlong bean revealed by RAPDs and microsatellites. Agr. Sci. J. 32 (Suppl): 185-189 
    32. Pooprompan P, Tamiesak P, Hosaki K. 1996. Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for identification of yardlong bean cultivars. In the 22nd Congress on Science and Technology of Thailand. 16-18 October 1996. Bangkok, Thailand SAS. 1985. SAS 
    33. Poresbski SL, Bailey G, Baum RB. 1997. Modification of CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 12: 8-15 
    34. Rohlf FJ. 2000. NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1 Exeter Software, Setauket, USA 
    35. Sales MP, Gerhardt IR, Grossi-de-Sa MF, Xavier-Filho J. 2000. Do legume storage proteins play a role in defending seeds against bruchids. Plant Physiol. 124: 515-522 
    36. Sarutayophat T, Nualsri C, Santipracha Q, Saereeprasert V. 2007. Characteriza-tion and genetic relatedness among 37 yardlong bean and cowpea accessions based on morphological characters and RAPD analysis. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 29: 291-600 
    37. Schut JW, Qi X, Stam P. 1997. Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barly. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 1161-1168 
    38. Seifelnasr YE. 1991. The role of asparagine and seed coat thickness in resistance of Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Col., Bruchidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 111: 412-417 
    39. Silva LB, Sales MP, Oliveira AEA, Machado OT, Fernandes KVS, Xavier-Filho J. 2004. The seed coat of Phaseolus vulgaris interferes with the development of the cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 76: 57-65 
    40. Simmonds MSJ, Blaney WM, Birch ANE. 1989. Legume seeds: The defences of wild and cultivated species of Phaseolus against bruchid beetles. Annals of Botany 63: 177-184 
    41. Singh BB, DR, Mohan Raj, Dashiell KE, Jackai LEN. 1997. Advances in cowpea research. IITA-JIRCAS, Ibadan, Nigeria 
    42. Singh BB, Ishivaku MF. 2000. Genetics of rough seed coat texture in cowpea. J. Hered. 91: 170-174 
    43. Smartt J. 1990. Grain Legumes - Evolution and Genetic Resources, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 
    44. Tanttawi DM, Abdel-Sabour GA, and Hosseny MH. 2007. Genetic studies for some agronomic characters in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences 38 (4):117-137 
    45. Tarver MR, Shade RE, Shukle RH, Moar WJ, Muir WM, Murdock L M, Pittendrigh BR. 2007. Pyramiding of insecticidal compounds for control of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus F.). Pest Manag. Sci. 63: 440-446 
    46. Tosti N, Negri V. 2002. Efficiency of three PCR-based markers in assessing genetic variation among cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp. unguiculata) landraces. Genome 45: 268-275 
    47. Vaillancourt RE, Weeden NF, Barnard J. 1993. Isozyme diversity in the cowpea species complex. Crop Sci. 33: 606-613 
    48. Van Emden HF. 1987. Cultural methods: the plant. In AJ Burn, TH Coaker, PC Iepson, (Eed, Integrated Pest Management, Academic Press, London, pp 27-67 
    49. Vincenzo L, Roberto T, Nunzia C, Angela C, Venere D Di, Vito L. 2005. Seed coat tannins and bruchid resistance in stored cowpea seeds. J. Sci. Food Agr. 85: 839-846 
    50. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak J, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535 
    51. Xavier-Filho J, Campos FAP, Ary MB, Silva CP, Carvalho MMM, Macedo MLR, Lemos FJA, Grant G. 1989. Poor cor relation between the levels of proteinase inhibitors found in seeds of different cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and the resistance/susceptibility to predation by Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Agr. Food Chem. 37: 1139-1143 
    52. Xavier-Filho J, Sales MP, Fernandes KVS, Gomes VM. 1996. The resistance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds to the cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) is due to the association of variant vicilins (7S storage proteins) to chitinous structures in the insect's midgut. Arquivos de Biologiae Tecnologia 39: 693- 699 
    53. Yunes, AA, Sales MT, Andrade MP, Morais RA, Fernandes KVS, Gomes J, Xavier-Filho VM, de Andrade MT. 1998. Legume seed vicilins (7S storage proteins) interfere with the development of the cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculates [F]). J. Sci. Food Agr. 76: 111-116 
  • 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (2)

    1. Kim, Dong-Kwan ; Son, Dong-Mo ; Choi, Jin-Gyung ; Shin, Hae-Ryong ; Choi, Kyeong-Ju ; Lee, Jeongran ; Lee, Kyung-Dong ; Rim, Yo-Sup 2013. "Agronomic Characteristics and Seed Quality of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Germplasm" Korean journal of crop science = 韓國作物學會誌, 58(1): 1~7     
    2. Kim, Dong-Kwan ; Son, Dong-Mo ; Lee, Kyung-Dong ; Rim, Yo-Sup ; Chung, Jung-Sung 2014. "Effects of Sowing Date on Agronomic Characteristics of Intermediate-erect Type Cowpea Grown in Plastic Greenhouse" Korean journal of crop science = 韓國作物學會誌, 59(4): 470~476     

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기