본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Norway의 보건의료서비스 우선순위 결정
Health Priority Setting in Norway

임문혁  
  • 초록

    In comparison to Western countries where health priority setting has been dealt as an important agenda of health policy for the last two decades, little study has been conducted concerning this matter in Korea. In the near future, since health priority setting will become a hot issue of health policy in Korea, it is necessary to conduct studies on foreign cases concerning health priority setting. Against this background, this paper reviews the development of priority setting policies which has been an important part of the national agenda for health services in Norway. In addition, the impact of the specific approaches taken by the National Priority Commissions in Norway is evaluated and some key issues are noted for further policy debate. Norway was the first country in the world to undertake work on priority setting issue through a National Priority Commission (known as L?ning Ⅰ), which operated between 1985 and 1987. The policy recommendations of L?ning Ⅰ report were officially adopted in 1989 as part of the National Health Plan. But for several years limited attempts were made to implement the priorities. The recommendations of L?ning Ⅰ report seem to have been intended to provide only a guide to allocating resources at the planning level not as a way of making clinical decisions in individual cases. Therefore, a second commission(L?ning Ⅱ) was set up to evaluate the implementation of the first Commission"s recommendations and to consider techniques for formulating priorities and published its report(L?ning Ⅱ report) in 1997. The L?ning Ⅱ report reaches very sceptical conclusions concerning the possibility of devising rational priority-setting systems which can directly legitimize the priority decisions. Reliance on technical solutions based on scientific reasoning will remain inadequate if not placed within the context of political procedures. In addition, the L?ning Ⅱ report recommends a fundamental revision of setting priorities. Instead of top-down system with one overarching definition of necessary treatment and care, a bottom-up system is recommended based on specialty-specific working groups. Experience from Norway shows that a combination of guiding principles, fair procedures and appropriate medical judgements can secure the necessary legitimacy of the decisions made.


  • 주제어

    National Priority Commission .   priority setting .   L?ning Ⅰ report .   L?ning Ⅱ report .   Norway.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기