본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Family practice v.34 no.1, 2017년, pp.90 - 97   SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?

Mallapareddi, Arun (<sup>a</sup>Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA and ) ; Ruterbusch, Julie (<sup>b</sup>Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. ) ; Reamer, Elyse (<sup>a</sup>Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA and ) ; Eggly, Susan (<sup>b</sup>Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. ) ; Xu, Jinping (<sup>a</sup>Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA and ) ;
  • 초록  

    Background. Active surveillance (AS) is recognized as a reasonable treatment option for low-risk localized prostate cancer (LPC) but continues to be chosen by a minority of men. To date, limited data are available regarding reasons why men with low-risk LPC adopt AS. Purpose. The aim of this study is to better understand conceptualizations, experiences and reasons why men with low-risk LPC and their partners adopt AS. Methods. We conducted five focus groups (FGs), three among men with low-risk LPC who had chosen AS and two with their partners. FGs were video/audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis. Results. A total of 12 men and 6 partners (all women) participated in FG discussions. The most common reasons for choosing AS were seeing the LPC as ‘small’ or ‘low grade’ without need for immediate treatment and trusting their physician’s AS recommendation. The most common concerns about AS were perceived unreliability of prostate specific antigen, pain associated with prostate biopsies and potential cancer progression. Partners saw themselves as very involved in their husbands’ treatment decision-making process, more than men acknowledged them to be. Multiple terms including ‘watchful waiting’ were used interchangeably with AS. There appeared to be a lack of understanding that AS is not simply ‘doing nothing’ but is actually a recognized management option for low-risk LPC. Conclusions. Emphasizing the low risk of a man’s LPC and enhancing physician trust may increase acceptability of AS. Standardizing terminology and presenting AS as a reasonable and recognized management option may also help increase its adoption.


  • 주제어

    Active surveillance .   barriers .   decision-making .   facilitators .   low-risk localized prostate cancer .   qualitative study.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기