본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Human reproduction v.32 no.2, 2017년, pp.354 - 361   SCI SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Effect of pretreatment with oral contraceptives and progestins on IVF outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Wei, Daimin (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 157 Jingliu Road, Jinan 250001, China ) ; Shi, Yuhua (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 157 Jingliu Road, Jinan 250001, China ) ; Li, Jing (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 157 Jingliu Road, Jinan 250001, China ) ; Wang, Ze (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 157 Jingliu Road, Jinan 250001, China ) ; Zhang, Lin (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 157 Jingliu Road, Jinan 250001, China ) ; Sun, Yun (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 845 Lingshan Road, Shanghai 200000, China ) ; Zhou, Hong (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Guangxi, 225 Xinyang Road, Nanning 530003, China ) ; Xu, Yuping (Center for Reproductive Medicine, The Fir ) ; Wu, Chunxiang ; Liu, Ling ; Wu, Qiongfang ; Zhuang, Lili ; Du, Yanzhi ; Li, Weiping ; Zhang, Heping ; Legro, Richard S. ; Chen, Zi-Jiang ;
  • 초록  

    STUDY QUESTION Do oral contraceptives (OCs) and progestins impact live birth rate of IVF when used for cycle scheduling in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? SUMMARY ANSWER OCs used for scheduling IVF cycle were associated with lowered rates of pregnancy and live birth after fresh embryo transfer, whereas progestins used for this purpose yield higher rates of pregnancy and live birth than OCs. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Due to oligo-menorrhea in PCOS, OCs and progestin are extensively used to schedule the start of an IVF cycle in women with PCOS. Little is known about the effect of such pretreatments on outcomes, especially, the rate of live birth. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a nested cohort study and secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial, which was designed to compare live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer vs frozen embryo transfer (FET) in women with PCOS (Frefro-PCOS). A total of 1508 women were enrolled from 14 centers between June 2013 and May 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS At the discretion of local investigators, subjects were instructed to wait for spontaneous menses (Control group, n = 323), or were prescribed progestins (P group, n = 283) or OCs (OCs group, n = 902) to induce menstruation prior to the start of ovarian stimulation. GnRH antagonist protocol was initiated at Day 2 or 3 of induced or spontaneous menses cycle. The rates of pregnancy, pregnancy loss and live birth after either fresh embryo transfer or FET were compared among these three groups. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE With fresh embryo transfer, women with OC-induced menses had lower rates of clinical pregnancy (48.8% vs 63.6%, relative rate (RR): 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66–0.89) and live birth (36.1% vs 48.1%, RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.92) than women with spontaneous menses. With freeze-all and deferred FET, women with OC-induced menses had a similar pregnancy rate but a higher pregnancy loss rate (27.7% vs 13.0%, RR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.28–3.52) after FET than women with spontaneous menses. The live birth rate after FET in women with OC-induced menses, progestin-induced menses and spontaneous menses was 49.4%, 50.7% and 60.2%, respectively ( P = 0.06). Progestin-induced menses was associated with similar rates of pregnancy, pregnancy loss and live birth after transfer of either fresh or frozen embryos compared with spontaneous menses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that OCs used for menses induction was associated with lower rate of live birth. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The methods for menses induction were not assigned randomly, thus selection bias was highly likely because of the study design and significant differences that were observed in the baseline characteristics of the women in the different groups. The mean BMI in this study population was relatively normal; the applicability of this result to obese PCOS women needs to be evaluated in further study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results suggest that either waiting for a spontaneous menses or using progestin is a better option than using OCs to induce menses in women with PCOS prior to ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2012CB944700), the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81430029), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471428) and Thousand Talents Program (Drs Legro and Zhang H). Dr Legro reports receiving consulting fees from Euroscreen, Kindex, Bayer and Millendo Pharmaceuticals and research funding from Ferring. Others report no disclo


  • 주제어

    oral contraceptives .   progestin .   polycystic ovary syndrome .   live birth .   embryo transfer.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠
이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기