본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Human reproduction v.32 no.2, 2017년, pp.403 - 408   SCI SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Perceived challenges of working in a fertility clinic: a qualitative analysis of work stressors and difficulties working with patients

Boivin, Jacky (Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK ); Bunting, Laura ( BRAIN, Neurosciences and Mental Health Research Institute NMHRI, Cardiff University, Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK ); Koert, Emily ( Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK ); ieng U, Chin ( Work completed during postgraduate studies in the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences Graduate School, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK ); Verhaak, Christianne ( Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands );
  • 초록  

    STUDY QUESTION What are some of the challenges of working in a fertility clinic? SUMMARY ANSWER The most frequently mentioned challenges were workload (e.g. high time pressure) and patient-related sources (e.g. unrealistic expectations). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY One study showed a too high workload, worry about handling human material and low success rates were main stressors in fertility clinics. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION An online open-ended survey inviting participants to respond to seven questions was distributed to 5902 members of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE, October 2010). Questions asked participants to describe the top three factors that made (i) their work stressful (hereafter ‘Work stressors’) and (ii) working with patients difficult (hereafter ‘Perceived sources of difficulties’), and (iii) to choose from these factors which top three issues they would be willing to attend a workshop to resolve (hereafter ‘Workshops’). A qualitative content analysis using inductive coding for each question was used to extract meaningful themes from the text replies, at three levels of increasing abstraction (lower and higher categories, general themes). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The final sample comprised 526 respondents (8.9% participation rate). Respondents were predominantly clinicians (41.3%, n = 216) or embryologists (35.5%, n = 186) from European countries (73.0%, n = 386). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The number of text replies generated for each question was 1421, 1208 and 907 for the ‘Work Stressors’, ‘Perceived sources of difficulties’ and ‘Workshop’ questions, respectively. The most often reported higher-order categories of Work Stressors were ‘Time and Workload’ (61.6%, e.g. time pressure), ‘Organisation, Team and management issues’ (60.4%, e.g. team conflicts) and ‘Job content and work environment’ (50.3%, e.g. burdensome administration). For ‘Perceived sources of difficulties’ these were ‘Patient-related sources’ (66.7%, e.g. unrealistic expectations), ‘Communication and Counselling with patients’ (33.7%, e.g. strained information giving) and ‘Misinformation and lack of knowledge’ (27.8%, e.g. Dr Google). Finally, the topics participants would be willing to address in Workshops were ‘Communicating and Counselling with Patients’ (24.9%), ‘Dealing with Patient-related sources’ (19.6%) and ‘Clinical topics’ (19.6%). Three general themes emerged. First, a theme of ‘time and time trade-offs’ expressed the oft-mentioned need to trade-off time spent on one activity (e.g. managing patient demands) against another activity (e.g. clinical workload, administration) with stress level dependent on the efficacy of trading-off. Second, the theme of ‘multifactorial causes’ of challenging patient interactions that embodied the many sources of difficulties working with patients. What staff would be willing to address in workshops was indicated by the final general theme of ‘a little of everything’, which linked to the need for multiple workshops addressing the multifactorial nature of challenges in fertility clinics. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only about 10% of members receiving the survey participated. The work was limited to the stressful and difficult aspects of working in fertility clinics, which may give a more negative impression than if questions about the rewards and benefits had also been included. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The nature of stressors and difficulties of working in a fertility clinic are consistent w


  • 주제어

    occupational stress .   healthcare professional .   fertility .   patient complexity .   communication.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기