본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Journal of prosthodontic research v.61 no.1, 2017년, pp.20 - 33   SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Reliability and validity of the patient disability-oriented diagnostic nomenclature system for prosthetic dentistry

Matsuka, Y. ; Hagiwara, Y. ; Tamaki, K. ; Takeuchi, H. ; Fujisawa, M. ; Ono, T. ; Tsukiyama, Y. ; Nagao, K. ; Tsuga, K. ; Aita, H. ; Kondo, H. ; Fueki, K. ; Tsukasaki, H. ; Nishigawa, K. ; Ozawa, S. ; Kuwatsuru, R. ; Minakuchi, H. ; Iinuma, T. ; Matsuura, T. ; Ishibashi, K. ; Fujii, S. ; Hirai, T. ; Sasaki, K. ; Yatani, H. ; Igarashi, Y. ; Sato, Y. ; Ichikawa, T. ; Yamamori, T. ; Kuboki, T. ; Baba, K. ; Koyano, K. ;
  • 초록  

    Purpose: The Japan Prosthodontic Society (JPS) has proposed a new diagnostic nomenclature system (DNS), based on pathogenesis and etiology, to facilitate and improve prosthodontic treatment. This system specifies patient disability and the causative factor (i.e. ''B (disability) caused by A (causative factor)''). The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of this DNS. Study selection: The JPS Clinical Guideline Committee assessed mock patient charts and formulated disease names using the new DNS. Fifty validators, comprising prosthodontic specialists and dental residents, made diagnoses using the same patient charts. Reliability was evaluated as the consistency of the disease names among the validators, and validity was evaluated using the concordance rate of the disease names with the reference disease names. Results: Krippendorff's α was 0.378 among all validators, 0.370 among prosthodontic specialists, and 0.401 among dental hospital residents. Krippendorff's α for 10 validators (3 specialists and 7 residents) with higher concordance rates was 0.524. Two validators (1 specialist and 1 resident) with the highest concordance rates had a Krippendorff's α of 0.648. Common disease names had higher concordance rates, while uncommon disease names showed lower concordance rates. These rates did not show correlation with clinical experience of the validator or time taken to devise the disease name. Conclusions: High reliability was not found among all validators; however, validators with higher concordance rates showed better reliability. Furthermore, common disease names had higher concordance rates. These findings indicate that the new DNS for prosthodontic dentistry exhibits clinically acceptable reliability and validity.


  • 주제어

    Diagnostic nomenclature system .   Prosthodontic treatment .   Reliability .   Validity.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기