'Standard' versus 'nose reference' electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound: Test-retest reliability and preliminary patient results
Objectives: This study compared two electrode placements ('standard' versus 'nose reference' placement) for measuring oVEMPs, elicited by air-conducted 500Hz tone bursts. The test-retest reliability of both positions was evaluated and additionally both electrode placements were applied on a group of vestibular patients. Methods: Eighteen healthy volunteers (range of 20-25years) participated in the first part and were retested after one week for evaluation of the test-retest reliability. Eleven patients (range of 41-74years) with a variety of vestibular pathologies were tested once. Results: In the normal group, the nose reference electrode placement resulted in significantly larger peak-to-peak amplitudes (p ME ) and the minimal detectable differences (MDD). In the patient group, the same significant amplitude difference was found. Moreover, three patients presented with absent oVEMPs when recorded with the standard placement, whereas the nose reference placement could evoke a detectable oVEMP response. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a nose reference electrode position results in larger oVEMP amplitudes and achieves a better reliability for the most important clinical parameters (amplitude and IOR). Our patient data substantiate the possible clinical benefit of this position, but further systematic patient verification is required. Significance: The nose reference electrode position facilitates the detection of generally very small oVEMP responses and shows a high test-retest reliability, showing promising potential for future use in the vestibular clinic.
유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.
원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.
NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.
- 이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기