GlideScope versus McCoy laryngoscope: Intubation profile for cervically unstable patients in critical care setting
Background: Endotracheal intubation for cervically unstable patients remains a challenging procedure. We compared the utility of a relatively new promising airway tool ''GlideScope'' (GL) with the routinely used McCoy laryngoscope in our critical care unit. Methods: Forty intubated patients with suspected or proved cervical spine injury who were scheduled for replacing a conventional endotracheal tube (ETT) by ETT with subglottic suction facility were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly intubated using either GL ''G group'' or McCoy laryngoscope ''M group''. The first attempt was performed by anesthetic residents inexperienced in using both scopes. In case of failure, a second attempt was done by a consultant anesthetist using these tools masterly. If these two attempts failed to intubate the trachea, a third one was attempted using a fiberoscope by the same consultant anesthetist. We compared the intubation profiles of both scopes. Results: There was a higher success rate of primary intubation attempts among the G group population (85% versus 55% in the M group ''P value 0.03''). Moreover, all secondary intubation attempts succeeded in intubating the trachea. The mean time for primary intubation attempts was statistically longer in the M group (27.6+/-2.7S versus 19.8+/-5.2S in the G group ''P value
- 원문이 없습니다.
유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.
NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.
- 이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠
- 이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기