본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Ecosystem services v.23, 2017년, pp.55 - 70   SCIE SSCI
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Shades of grey challenge practical application of the cultural ecosystem services concept

Blicharska, Malgorzata (Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7016, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden ); Smithers, Richard J. (Ricardo Energy & Environment, Gemini Building, Fermi Avenue, Harwell, Didcot OX11 0QR, UK ); Hedblom, Marcus (Department of Forest Resources Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden ); Hedenås, Henrik (Department of Forest Resources Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden ); Mikusiński, Grzegorz (Grimsö ); Pedersen, Eja (Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden ); Sandström, Per (Environmental Psychology, Department of Architecture and the Built Environment, Lund University, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden ); Svensson, Johan (Department of Forest Resources Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden );
  • 초록  

    Abstract Despite rapid advances in development of the ecosystem services (ES) concept, challenges remain for its use in decision making. Cultural ES (CES) have proven particularly difficult to pin down and resultant “shades of grey” impede their consideration by decision-makers. This study undertakes a literature review of CES to highlight the shades of grey, briefly illustrates findings by reference to the Swedish mountain landscape, then addresses potential implications for practical decision making. The concept of CES is complex and difficult to operationalize. The root of confusion appears to be a lack of rigour in identifying CES, hindering identification of proper methods for determining: the ecosystem elements that underpin CES; the beneficiaries of CES and how they value benefits delivered; and how CES may vary in space and time. We conclude by proposing a framework of questions, which we relate to the ES cascade model, that is intended to help researchers and decision-makers to reflect when considering CES. Answers to the questions should enable decision-makers to prioritise policy development or implementation in relation to the differing needs of potentially competing beneficiaries and what needs to be done or not done to the ecosystem, where, when and by whom. Highlights We reviewed cultural ecosystem services (CES) studies to highlight shades of grey. Many studies did not identify links between CES and ecosystem elements. Many studies did not identify the beneficiaries that perceive the CES. Many studies did not identify the spatial extent or timespan of CES delivery. We propose a framework of questions for CES assessments to better inform practical decisions.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기