본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Endoscopy v.49 no.2, 2017년, pp.146 - 153   SCI SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access versus precut papillotomy in patients with failed biliary cannulation: a retrospective study

Lee, Alexander (Department of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Aditi, Anupam (Department of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Bhat, Yasser M. (Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Binmoeller, Kenneth F. (Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Hamerski, Chris (Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Sendino, Oriol (Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Kane, Steve (Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Cello, John P. (Department of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Day, Lukejohn W. (Department of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA ) ; Mohamadnejad, Medi (Department of Gastroenterology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, US ) ; Muthusamy, V. Raman ; Watson, Rabindra ; Klapman, Jason B. ; Komanduri, Sri ; Wani, Sachin ; Shah, Janak N. ;
  • 초록  

    Background and aims Precut papillotomy is widely used after failed biliary cannulation. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary access techniques are newer methods to facilitate access and therapy in failed cannulation. We evaluated the impact of EUS-guided biliary access on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) success and compared these techniques to precut papillotomy.Patients and methods We retrospectively compared two ERCP cohorts. One cohort consisted of biliary ERCPs (n = 1053) attempted in patients with native papillae and surgically unaltered anatomy in whom precut papillotomy and/or EUS-guided biliary access were routinely performed immediately after failed cannulation. This cohort was compared with a similar ERCP cohort (n = 1062) in which only precut papillotomy was available for failed cannulation. The following outcomes were compared: conventional cannulation success, rates of attempted advanced access techniques (precut or EUS), precut success, EUS-guided biliary access success, and ERCP failure rates.Results Although conventional cannulation success, rates of attempted advanced access technique (precut or EUS), and precut success were similar, the ERCP failure rate was lower when both EUS-guided biliary access and precut were available (1.0 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 – 1.6]), compared with when only precut was possible for failed access (3.6 % [95 %CI 2.5 – 4.7]; P 


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기