본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Journal of bone and joint surgery : American volume v.99 no.4, 2017년, pp.315 - 323   SCI SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation

Aneja, Arun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina ) ; Jiang, Jimmy J. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois ) ; Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois ) ; Luu, Hue L. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois ) ; Peabody, Terrance D. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Galter-Pavilion-Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois ) ; Attar, Samer (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Galter-Pavilion-Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois ) ; Luo, T. David (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina ) ; Haydon, Rex C. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois ) ;
  • 초록  

    Background: We are not aware of any previous studies that have compared the rate of venous thromboembolic events in patients who underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing because of an impending fracture with the rate in patients who underwent intramedullary nailing after a pathological fracture. The objective of the present study was to determine if the rate of venous thromboembolic events varies between patients who are managed with prophylactic fixation and those who are managed with fixation after a pathological fracture. Methods: We performed a retrospective comparative study in which the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who had undergone femoral stabilization, either for a pathological femoral fracture or for prophylactic fixation of femoral metastatic lesion, over a period of 10 consecutive years (between 2002 and 2011) in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, venous thromboembolic event rates, and other common postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Patients who were managed with prophylactic fixation had significantly higher rates of pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1) and deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.03; adjusted odds ratio, 1.5). Patients who were managed with fixation after a pathological fracture had a significantly greater need for blood transfusion, higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infection, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged to home (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: Patients with metastatic disease who undergo prophylactic intramedullary nailing have higher observed rates of venous thromboembolic events than those who undergo nailing for the treatment of a pathological fracture and should be actively and vigilantly managed in the postoperative period. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기