Epileptic seizure or not? Proportion of correct judgement based only on a video recording of a paroxysmal event
Abstract Purpose Our study was intended to measure the proportion of correct seizure recognition among different medical and non-medical groups based on only a video recording. Methods Video recordings about paroxysmal movements of 15 very young infants (2days − 5 months of age) were displayed for six groups: 159 1st-year medical students, 65 4–5th-year medical students, 52 paediatric residents, 18 paediatric neurologists from different European countries, 43 adult neurologists and 37 parents whose children were treated at our Department. All participants were asked to decide which recording they considered as of epileptic origin or a non-epileptic event. Correct answer rate (CAR) was calculated in each group for every video. Results The average CAR was the lowest in the group of 1st-year medical students (36.6%), the best results were reached by paediatric neurologists (67.4%). The CAR was significantly different between the groups of 1st-year medical students and paediatric neurologists (p=0.02), and between the groups of 1st-year medical students and residents (p=0.045). The CAR of the most deceptive epileptic seizure was only 18.2%. The judgement of parents proved to be better than that of the 1st-year medical students. Conclusions Recognising epileptic seizures in very young infants without EEG is extremely inaccurate. Even trained paediatric neurologists were able to judge correctly the different movement types in only 67.4% of the cases. The role of education and experience is clearly indicated by the increase in CAR from 1st-year medical students through well–trained paediatric neurologists. Highlights Correct diagnosis of infantile seizures without history and EEG is extremely hard. Correct epilepsy recognition grows proportionally with professional qualification. Experience and education improve the accuracy of seizure recognition.
유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.
원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.
NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.
- 이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기