본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

The Journal of arthroplasty v.33 no.1, 2018년, pp.195 - 199   SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Failed Two-Stage Exchange: Factors Leading to Unachievable Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Multiple Revision Surgeries

Staats, Kevin (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ) ; Boehler, Christoph (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ) ; Frenzel, Stephan (Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ) ; Puchner, Stephan E. (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ) ; Holinka, Johannes (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ) ; Windhager, Reinhard (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ) ;
  • 초록  

    Abstract Background Information about the outcome after failed 2-stage exchange is scarce. The aim of this study is to determine possible influencing factors leading to multiple revisions, resulting in a failed endoprosthetic joint reconstruction. Methods Medical records of patients (15 hip and 29 knee joints) who had undergone additional revision surgeries due to a failed 2-stage exchange were reviewed concerning infection parameters, number and type of procedure(s), current state of the revised joint, and whether failure of endoprosthetic reconstruction had occurred. Results Endoprosthetic reconstruction was achieved in 52.3% ( n = 23) of the patients. About 36.4% ( n = 16) of patients successfully reached the second stage of the initial 2-stage exchange. Half of the patients ( n = 22) had to undergo spacer exchange in the initial interstage period. Five or more revision surgeries significantly increased the odds of failure of endoprosthetic reconstruction compared to patients with P = .016). Patients with initial culture-negative revision surgery showed no significant differences in the odds of failure of endoprosthetic reconstruction (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.20-2.43, P = .567). Conclusion Patients undergoing re-revision surgery due to a failed 2-stage exchange are very likely to ultimately experience a failed endoprosthetic reconstruction. The identification of the underlying pathogen does not influence the likelihood of a better outcome in terms of a successful endoprosthetic reconstruction.


  • 주제어

    infection .   2-stage .   arthroplasty .   multiple revisions .   failed 2-stage.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기