본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

International journal of medical informatics v.111, 2018년, pp.90 - 99   SCI SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Prediction models to identify individuals at risk of metabolic syndrome who are unlikely to participate in a health intervention program

Shimoda, Akihiro (Department of Clinical Information Engineering, Division of Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan ) ; Ichikawa, Daisuke (Department of Clinical Information Engineering, Division of Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan ) ; Oyama, Hiroshi (Department of Clinical Information Engineering, Division of Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan ) ;
  • 초록  

    Abstract Objectives Since the launch of a nationwide general health check-up and instruction program in Japan in 2008, interest in strategies to improve implementation of the program based on predictive analytics has grown. We investigated the performance of prediction models developed to identify individuals classified as “requiring instruction” (high-risk) who were unlikely to participate in a health intervention program. Methods Data were obtained from one large health insurance union in Japan. The study population included individuals who underwent at least one general health check-up between 2008 and 2013 and were identified as “requiring instruction” in 2013. We developed three prediction models based on the gradient boosted trees (GBT), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) algorithms using machine-learning techniques and compared the areas under the curve (AUC) of the developed models with those of two conventional methods The aim of the models was to identify at-risk individuals who were unlikely to participate in the instruction program in 2013 after being classified as requiring instruction at their general health check-up that year. Results At first we performed the analysis using data without multiple imputation. The AUC values for the GBT, RF, and LR prediction models and conventional methods: 1, and 2 were 0.893 (95%CI: 0.882–0.905), 0.889 (95%CI: 0.877–0.901), 0.885 (95%CI: 0.872–0.897), 0.784 (95%CI: 0.767–0.800), and 0.757 (95%CI: 0.741–0.773), respectively. Subsequently, we performed the analysis using data after multiple imputation. The AUC values for the GBT, RF, and LR prediction models and conventional methods: 1, and 2 were 0.894 (95%CI: 0.882–0.906), 0.889 (95%CI: 0.887–0.901), 0.885 (95%CI: 0.872–0.898), 0.784 (95%CI: 0.767–0.800), and 0.757 (95%CI: 0.741–0.773), respectively. In both analyses, the GBT model showed the highest AUC among that of other models, and statistically significant difference were found in comparison with the LR model, conventional method 1, and conventional method 2. Conclusion The prediction models using machine-learning techniques outperformed existing conventional methods: for predicting participation in the instruction program among participants identified as “requiring instruction” (high-risk). Highlights The prediction models outperformed conventional methods for predicting participation in instruction program after general health check-up. There was no difference in performance between prediction models without multiple imputation and those with multiple imputation. The most important predictor were past participation in instruction program and diagnosis of general health check-up. This predictive method would contribute to select more appropriate intervention targets.


  • 주제어

    Health check-up .   Instruction program .   Machine learning .   Prediction.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
  • 원문이 없습니다.

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기