본문 바로가기
HOME> 논문 > 논문 검색상세

논문 상세정보

Journal of gynecologic oncology : jgo v.29 no.4, 2018년, pp.e50 -    SCIE
본 등재정보는 저널의 등재정보를 참고하여 보여주는 베타서비스로 정확한 논문의 등재여부는 등재기관에 확인하시기 바랍니다.

Are patients and physicians willing to accept less-radical procedures for cervical cancer?

Gungorduk, Kemal    (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Education and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey .  ); Kocian, Roman    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Center, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic .  ); Basaran, Derman    (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey .  ); Turan, Taner    (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey .  ); Ozdemir, Aykut    (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Education and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey .  ); Cibula, David    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Center, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic .  );
  • 초록

    Objective To evaluate the opinions of women who underwent surgery for cervical cancer (CC) and physicians who treat CC about the acceptability of increased oncological risk after less-radical surgery. Methods One hundred eighty-two women who underwent surgery for CC and 101 physicians participated in a structured survey in 3 tertiary cancer centers in Czech Republic and Turkey. Patients and physicians were asked whether they would accept any additional oncological risks, which would be attributable to the omission of parametrectomy (radical hysterectomy/trachelectomy vs. simple hysterectomy/trachelectomy) or pelvic lymph node dissection (systematic resection vs. sentinel lymph node sampling). Results Although 52.2% of patients reported morbidity related to their previous treatment, the majority of patients would not accept less-radical surgical treatment if it was associated with any increased risk of recurrence (50%–55%, no risk; 17%–24%, risk Conclusion Patients, even if they suffered from morbidity related to previous CC treatment, do not want to choose between oncological safety and a better quality of life. Physicians tend to accept the higher oncological risk associated with less-radical surgical procedures, but attitudes differ regionally. Professionals should be aware of this tendency when counselling the patients before less-radical surgery.


  • 주제어

    Uterine Cervical Neoplasms .   Surgery .   Morbidity .   Quality of Life.  

 활용도 분석

  • 상세보기

    amChart 영역
  • 원문보기

    amChart 영역

원문보기

무료다운로드
유료다운로드

유료 다운로드의 경우 해당 사이트의 정책에 따라 신규 회원가입, 로그인, 유료 구매 등이 필요할 수 있습니다. 해당 사이트에서 발생하는 귀하의 모든 정보활동은 NDSL의 서비스 정책과 무관합니다.

원문복사신청을 하시면, 일부 해외 인쇄학술지의 경우 외국학술지지원센터(FRIC)에서
무료 원문복사 서비스를 제공합니다.

NDSL에서는 해당 원문을 복사서비스하고 있습니다. 위의 원문복사신청 또는 장바구니 담기를 통하여 원문복사서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

이 논문과 함께 출판된 논문 + 더보기